Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Comer v. Washington

292 U.S. 610

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1934-05-21
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 *611U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Hebert v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Comer v. Washington. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 1 opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 *611 U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273.

Mr. Ewing D. Colvin for appellant. Mr. John J. Sullivan for appellee.