Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

246 U.S. 653

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1918-03-25
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726; (2) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Collard v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
8 opinions
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) § 237, Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of Congress of September 6, 1916, c. 448, § 6, 39 Stat. 726; (2) Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173; Missouri & Kansas Interurban Ry. Co. v. Olathe, 222 U. S., 185; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99.