Coenen v. R. W. Pressprich & Co.

only those persons who have a privacy interest in the residence in which the tapped phone is located have standing | once a dispute is covered by the Act, federal law governs all questions of interpretation, construction, validity, revocability and enforceability | seaman drowned in tug-tow case where cargo overloading and improper lifeboat storage were statutory violations | arbitration between member firms of dispute arising before plaintiff became member of Exchange | dispute concerning sale of securities is covered by Federal Arbitration Act and “[o]nce a dispute is covered by the Act, federal law applies to all questions of interpretation, construction, validity, revocability, and enforceability.” | appellant lacked standing to suppress conversations intercepted by wiretap on co-defendant’s telephone | tapes may be properly sealed by another judge when issuing judge unavailable | common sense reading of affidavit to support finding of probable cause | Defendant non-member, broker-dealer firm, in a suit raising § 10(b | delay of thirty-nine days did not require suppression | 24-day and 42-day delays excused