Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Clark v. Hilliard

96 S. Ct. 805

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-01-12
Topic
general

a case involving prior representation of a Government witness by a defense counsel in a criminal case | failure of counsel to indicate to the trial court the nature of the alleged confidential information led to the conclusion that effective cross-examination was not precluded by the fact that defense counsel’s partner had represented prosecution witness | conflict directly raised by defense counsel

Citator

Cited by
36 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari denied.