Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
City & County of Honolulu v. Small Landowners of Oahu
City & County of Honolulu v. Small Landowners of Oahu, 525 U.S. 871 (1998)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1998-10-05
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- stating that the “solely because of’ standard applies to claims asserted under the Rehabilitation Act
- “[W]e see nothing inconsistent in applying heightened scrutiny when the taking is uncompensated, and a more deferential standard when the taking is fully compensated.”
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed City & County of Honolulu v. Small Landowners of Oahu. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 35 opinions
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.