Cinema Blue of Charlotte, Inc. v. North Carolina

holding that D’Oench bars borrowers’ securities law claims | requiring transferred or promoted employees to maintain union membership in order to retain seniority already earned constitutes impermissible discrimination under Sec. 8(a)(3) of the NLRA | considering reasonableness of FAA-mandated urinalysis for airline employees, the court ignored impact on privacy expectations of airlines’ privately implemented testing programs although such programs existed | considering reasonableness of FAA-mandated urinalysis for airline employees, the court ignored impact on privacy expectations of airlines' privately implemented testing programs although such programs existed | requiring transferred or promoted employees to maintain union membership in order to retain seniority already earned constitutes impermissible discrimination under § 8(a)(3) of the NLRA | “drug testing performed by private employers under compulsion of government regulations constitutes governmental action subject to constitutional restrictions.” | “Since the initial statement of the doctrine in D’Oench, Duhme, the Court has expanded its preclusive effect well beyond the context of an oral ‘secret agreement’ between the bank and the borrower” | upholding random urinalysis testing of airline personnel with safety responsibilities | applying D’Oench Duhme to affirmative claim of bank fraud | applying D'Oench Duhme to affirmative claim of bank fraud