Chesapeake Western Railway v. Tax Commissioner

attorney acting as representative of client, where both alleged to have abused court system, found not to be state actor | “kind of class-based animus contemplated by sec­tion 1985(3) does not include discrimination against classes defined by economic status or activity” | "kind of class-based animus contemplated by section 1985(3) does not include discrimination against classes defined by economic status or activity" | no right to a jury trial attaches to claims brought against a foreign state