Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Carter v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

17 L. Ed. 2d 546

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1967-01-09
Topic
general

'the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary' | where plaintiff claimed that defendant’s tariff was both invalid and was being applied in a discriminatory manner | court refused to “subscribe to the view that an author is absolutely precluded from saving time and effort by referring to and relying upon prior published material” | “the occasion for facing such a possibility ought not to be forced until it is inescapably necessary” | where an order not itself appealable served as "the reason" for an appealable injunctive order, this Court reviewed the underlying order as part and parcel of the appealable order | where an order not itself appealable served as "the reason” for an appealable injunctive order, this Court reviewed the underlying order as part and parcel of the appealable order | valid defense possible where plaintiff — Howard Hughes — threatened to “cause trouble” in retaliation for defendants’ plans to publish his biography, and subsequently obtained and brought suit based on copyrights to articles used in biography | Sixth Circuit reciting evidence sufficient to find joint employer | Sixth Circuit reciting evidence sufficient to find joint employer | extensive verbatim copying cannot be fair use

Citator

Cited by
94 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.