Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Carolene Products Co. v. Wallace

Carolene Prods. Co. v. Wallace, 308 U.S. 506 (1939)

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1939-10-09
Topic: general

Per Curiam: The motion to affirm is granted and the decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia is affirmed. Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497, 500; Spielman Motor Co. v. Dodge, 295 U.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Carolene Products Co. v. Wallace. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by: 2 opinions

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the decree of the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia is affirmed. Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497, 500; Spielman Motor Co. v. Dodge, 295 U. S. 89, 95-96.