Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cardenas-Lopez v. United States

536 U.S. 949

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2002-06-24
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • a district court is entitled to find that eleventh-hour tactic of pleading guilty after the court has denied a motion to suppress and has assembled a jury does not warrant acceptance of responsibility reduction
  • “[W]e hold that dismissal of an indictment is not an available form of relief where the notice requirement of the IAD is violated, even when that violation is attributable to the receiving State, here the United States.”

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cardenas-Lopez v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
10 opinions

536 U.S. 949

CARDENAS-LOPEZ
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 01-10357.

Supreme Court of the United States.

June 24, 2002.

1

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.