Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Cannedy v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

493 U.S. 891

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-10-10
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • magistrate's order requiring corporation to produce corporate officers in Chicago was correct because location was corporation's principal place of business
  • motion to reconsider is frivolous if it contains no new evidence or arguments or law that explains why court should change an original order
  • “An attorney takes a frivolous position if he fails to make a reasonable inquiry into facts (which later prove false) ...”
  • direet effect is one that is substantial and foreseeable, mere financial loss is insufficient

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Cannedy v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
40 opinions

Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.