Callahan v. Robtoy

finding that expert testimony describing results of luminal testing met section 2702 requirements; Frye not cited even though Court found it had never approved luminal testing | finding that expert testimony describing results of luminal testing met section 2702 requirements; Frye not cited even though Court found it had never approved luminal testing | incorporating a higher standard: no "substantial possibility" any reasonable juror would have rested a verdict on improper interpretation of "anti-sympathy" instruction given in the first stage and incorporated by reference into the second stage of a capital murder trial | incorporating a higher standard: no “substantial possibility” any reasonable juror would have rested a verdict on improper interpretation of “anti-sympathy” instruction given in the first stage and incorporated by reference into the second stage of a capital murder trial | death penalty supported by evidence that defendant armed himself with shotgun and shells before robbing grocery store with codefendant where three people were killed | there, as here, cross-examination exposed. the hair expert's imprecise and unscientific conclusion that a person can be positively identified by hair | the state constitution likewise is satisfied when a defendant receives the peremptory challenges allowable pursuant to state law | the state constitution likewise is satisfied when a defendant receives the peremptory challenges allowable pursuant to state law | defendant murdered three grocery employees in back room of the store — see also codefendant's case Fowler v. State, 779 P.2d 580 (Okl.Cr.1989), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1060, 110 S.Ct. 1537, 108 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990) | defendant murdered three grocery employees in back room of the store — see also codefendant's case Fowler v. State, 779 P.2d 580 (Okl.Cr.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1060, 110 S.Ct. 1537, 108 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990) | defen-dant murdered three grocery employees in back room of the store — see also codefendant's case Fowler v. State, 779 P.2d 580 (Okl.Cr.1989), ce rt. denied, 494 U.S. 1060, 110 S.Ct. 1537, 108 L.Ed.2d 775 (1990) | after accused invoked right to counsel, two homicide detectives went to the jail to see accused, accused was brought out of his cell, and detectives gave him their business cards "in case he or his attorney desired to contact the police"