Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
California v. United States
Cal. v. United States, 490 U.S. 920 (1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-06-12
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the Quiet Title Act displaces APA review of administrative decisions affecting title to land in which the United States claims an interest based on the land’s status as trust or restricted Indian land
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed California v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 20 opinions
CALIFORNIA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
No. 87-1165.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued November 28, 1988 Decided June 12, 1989 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUITJerome C. Muys argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Warren J. Abbott, Fred Vendig, Karen L. Tachiki, James F. Roberts, Justin McCarthy, John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General of California, R. H. Connett and N. Gregory Taylor, Assistant Attorneys General, and Douglas B. Noble, Deputy Attorney General, Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General of Arizona, and Anthony B. Ching, Solicitor General.
Edwin S. Kneedler argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Marzulla, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Edward J. Shawaker, and Sarah P. Robinson. Dale T. White argued the cause for the tribal respondents. With him on the brief were William E. Strickland and Scott B. McElroy.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment below is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
NOTES
[*] Richard Dauphinais filed a brief for the Klamath Tribe et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.