Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

California v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

Cal. v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 391 U.S. 365 (1968)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1968-05-20
Topic
general

Per Curiam. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgments are vacated. The cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Permian Basin Area Rate Cases, 390 U. S. 747.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed California v. Phillips Petroleum Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
CALIFORNIAv. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO.,391 U.S. 365(1968)
CALIFORNIA ET AL.v. PHILLIPS PETROLEUM CO. ET AL.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT.
No. 373.
Decided May 20, 1968.fn*
Certiorari granted;377 F.2d 278, vacated and remanded.
Mary Moran PajalichandJ. Calvin Simpsonfor petitioners in No. 373.Frederick T. SearlsandMalcolm H.Furbushfor Pacific Gas Electric Co.,C. Hayden Amesfor San Diego Gas Electric Co., andJohn Ormasafor Southern California Gas Co. et al., petitioners in No. 380.Solicitor General MarshallandRichard A. Solomonfor petitioner in No. 385.Tom P. Hamill, R. D. Haworth, James L. Armour,William H. Tabb, andCarroll L. Gilliamfor respondent Mobil Oil Corp. in all three cases.
PER CURIAM.
The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted and the judgments are vacated. The cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of thePermianBasin Area Rate Cases,390 U.S. 747.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS dissents.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.Page 366
  1. Page 365 Together with No. 380,Pacific Gas Electric Co. et al. v.PhillipsPetroleum Co. et al.,and No. 385,Federal Power Commissionv.Phillips Petroleum Co. et al.,also on petitions for writs of certiorari to the same court. ↩