Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

California State Board of Optometry v. California Citizens Action Group

424 U.S. 961

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1976-03-22
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • plaintiff wrongfully convicted of homicide had § 1983 claim for withholding of exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady
  • State investigative agent’s misleading testimony and failure to disclose exculpatory evidence at trial held to be violation of due process where it caused plaintiff’s conviction
  • police officer liable under § 1983 for falsely testifying in a criminal trial

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed California State Board of Optometry v. California Citizens Action Group. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status
pending
Cited by
36 opinions

Application to stay preliminary injunction entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, entered February 5, 1976, presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, granted pending further order of the Court. Mr. Jus *962 tice Stevens would deny the application. Motion of Terminai-Hudson Electronics of California, Inc., dba Opti-Cal, for leave to intervene as an appellee denied.