Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. Specialties Development Corp.

C-O-Two Fire Equip. Co. v. Specialties Dev. Corp., 347 U.S. 919 (1954)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1954-03-08
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • unobjected to evidence in a condemnation proceeding which had not taken depreciation into account: “The assignment will not be considered as constituting reversible error since it lacks the foundation of an objection in the court below”
  • "Recent sales of the very property condemned are entitled to considerable weight, but sales of similar property are entitled to weight also; and the relative importance of the two is dependent upon the facts in the particular condemnation proceeding."

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. Specialties Development Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
33 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.