Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

C & H Transportation Co. v. Jensen & Reynolds Construction Co.

C & H Transp. Co. v. Jensen & Reynolds Constr. Co., 466 U.S. 945 (1984)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1984-04-16
Topic
real-estate

How later courts describe this case

  • noting that even in death penalty cases objections to jury instructions cannot be raised for the first time on appeal
  • where a number of challenges were in issue, the most representative voir dire was used
  • fact that payment mailed to Texas is hardly significant in terms of purposeful availment
  • although the trial court made arguably improper remarks to a venireperson, counsel found reasonably effective despite failure to object because court was attempting to explain the law

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed C & H Transportation Co. v. Jensen & Reynolds Construction Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
30 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent Par Industries, Inc., for damages denied. Certiorari denied.