Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bustamante-Cuadros v. United States

464 U.S. 996

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1983-11-28
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • “[F]orcing a criminal defendant to go to trial pro se” without conducting an appropriate inquiry into his financial ability to afford counsel “constitutes a denial of that defendant’s sixth amendment right to counsel.”
  • "Though the magistrate used the term ‘indigen-cy,’ we believe that this was merely a ‘shorthand expression’ of financial inability to afford counsel.”
  • test is defendant’s financial inability to obtain the services of retained counsel

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bustamante-Cuadros v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
68 opinions

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.