Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bustamante-Cuadros v. United States
464 U.S. 996
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1983-11-28
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- “[F]orcing a criminal defendant to go to trial pro se” without conducting an appropriate inquiry into his financial ability to afford counsel “constitutes a denial of that defendant’s sixth amendment right to counsel.”
- "Though the magistrate used the term ‘indigen-cy,’ we believe that this was merely a ‘shorthand expression’ of financial inability to afford counsel.”
- test is defendant’s financial inability to obtain the services of retained counsel
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bustamante-Cuadros v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 68 opinions
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.