Burgess v. United States District Court

How later courts describe this case

• applying the limitation, but noting that courts have been exceedingly lenient in defining what is reasonable
• “rejecting the view that a plaintiff does not state a claim actionable under § 1983 unless he satisfies the requirements of an analogous common law tort”
• “[t]he proper remedy in a fraudulent conveyance claim is to rescind, or set aside, the allegedly fraudulent transfer, and cause the transferee to return the transferred property to the trans-feror.”