Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Builta v. General Electric Credit Corp.

439 U.S. 984

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1978-11-27
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • allowing indictment of criminal conspiracy between husband and wife and holding spousal communication privilege does not apply where both spouses engaged together in criminal activity
  • access to town boards in connection with efforts to perfect zoning amendments for shopping malls
  • Court engaged in an analysis of “access-barring” in the context of the legislative process
  • rule requiring graduation from ABA approved law school for admission valid
  • where corporation settles shareholder derivative suit, corporate officer co-defendant who is bound by settlement and therefore lacks standing to challenge settlement on appeal in capacity as officer may not circumvent bar by asserting right to appeal in capacity as non-settling shareholder
  • zoning board of appeals, county planning board and town board

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Builta v. General Electric Credit Corp.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
60 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.