Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley

Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley, 308 U.S. 508 (1939)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1939-10-09
Topic
general

The appe'al is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1025 (43 Stat. *509936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ' of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted. Mr. Terrell Marshall for petitioner.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Buckstaff Bath House Co. v. McKinley. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

The appe'al is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1025 (43 Stat. *509 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ' of certiorari as required by § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is granted.

Mr. Terrell Marshall for petitioner. Mr. W. L. Pope for respondents.