Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Buck's Stove & Range Co. v. American Federation of Labor

219 U.S. 581

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1911-01-27
Topic
general

Per Curiam: When these cases were reached for hearing and after the argument had materially progressed, it developed from statements made by counsel for both parties that the cases had become purely moot because of the settlement between the parties of every material controversy which the record presented. On the disclosure of this situation further argument was dispensed with; and for the reason which led to that action, that is, as we have said, that the controversies between the parties had -become in all respects moot, the appeals must be dismissed. Richardson v. McChesney, 218 U. S. 487, 492, and cases cited.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Buck's Stove & Range Co. v. American Federation of Labor. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
24 opinions
BUCK'S STOVE c. CO.v. AM. FED. OF LABOR,219 U.S. 581(1911)
31 S.Ct. 472
BUCK'S STOVE RANGE COMPANYv. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR.
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABORv. BUCK'S STOVE RANGE COMPANY.
APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Nos. 190, 394.
Argument commenced January 27, 1911.
The court declined to hear further argument.
Appeals dismissed without costs to either party, it having developed from statements of counsel for both parties that the cases had become purely moot because of the settlement between the parties of every material controversy which the record presented.
THE facts are stated in the opinion.
Mr. Daniel DavenportandMr. J.J. Darlingtonfor The Buck's Stove Range Company.Mr. Jackson H. Ralston, Mr. F.L. SiddonsandMr. William E.Richardsonfor The American Federation of Laboret al.
Per Curiam:
When these cases were reached for hearing and after the argument had materially progressed, it developed from statements made by counsel for both parties that the cases had become purely moot because of the settlement between the parties of every material controversy which the record presented. On the disclosure of this situation further argument was dispensed with; and for the reason which led to that action, that is, as we have said, that the controversies between the parties had become in all respects moot, the appeals must be dismissed.Richardsonv.McChesney,218 U.S. 487,492, and cases cited. Appeals dismissed, without costs to either party.Page 1