Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Buckley v. United States

60 L. Ed. 2d 242

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1979-04-02
Topic
general

compensating, under § 4, litigation of all issues "that a reasonable and prudent antitrust lawyer would have litigated" | compensating, under § 4, litigation of all issues “that a reasonable and prudent antitrust lawyer would have litigated” | "[n]ot only must the injury be direct, but it must be of the kind the antitrust laws were written to guard against." | “[n]ot only must the injury be direct, but it must be of the kind the antitrust laws were written to guard against.” | "where a defendant is improperly convicted for a lesser included offense, the proper remedy is to vacate both the conviction and sentence on the included offense, leaving the conviction and sentence on the greater offense intact" | The court held that failure to file is a lesser offense included in a § 7201 conviction. “Appellant argues, and we agree, that failure to file is a lesser offense included in a Section 7201 conviction based on the facts of this case. The government conceded as much at oral argument.” | defendant sought production of FBI investigative files

Citator

Cited by
66 opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.