Brown v. Missouri Pacific Railroad

" '[sjtatus quo' to be preserved by a preliminary injunction is the last actual, peaceable uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy” | " '[s]tatus quo' to be preserved by a preliminary injunction is the last actual, peaceable uncontested status which preceded the pending controversy" | "[I.R.C. § 401] does not appear to create any substantive rights that a beneficiary of a qualified retirement trust can enforce” | “This section [§ 401 of the I.R.C.] does not appear to create any substantive rights that a beneficiary of a qualified retirement trust can enforce.” | Party who loses case because the court lacked jurisdiction is not a prevailing party. | plaintiff’s post-argument letter to court commenting on case cited by defendant constituted unauthorized brief | Internal Revenue Code provisions do not create substantive rights under ERISA that can be enforced by an individual in a private cause of action as a participant under a tax-qualified pension plan (citing Cowan v. Keystone Employee Profit Sharing Fund, 586 F.2d 888, 890 n. 3 (1st Cir.1978