Brant v. Wisconsin

"proof that no first sale had occurred was not required because the government established that the tapes were pirated" | “proof that no first sale had occurred was not required because the government established that the tapes were pirated” | “It would be unsound to invoke the exclusionary rule on the assumption that officers of one federal agency have such a strong motivating interest in all federal law enforcement concerns that broad application of the rule will achieve significant marginal deterrence” | court declined to extend exclusionary rule to civil proceedings | court declined to extend exclusionary rule to civil proceedings | extending Janis holding to case involving federal agents | extending Janis holding to case involving federal agents