Brandt v. Chalkboard, Inc.

holding that standing requires organization to allege devotion of resources to activities other than litigation costs | discretion where there were no specific mandatory guidelines for the government's identification of the remains of servicemen | fair housing agency has standing if its time and money were deflected from counseling to legal efforts against discrimination | fair housing agency has standing if its time and money were deflected from counseling to legal efforts against discrimination | discretion where there were no specific mandatory guidelines for the government’s identification of the remains of servicemen | section 113 precluded judicial review of the procedure employed to select a remedial plan | “An organization cannot, of course, manufacture the injury necessaiy to maintain a suit from its expenditure of resources on that very suit. Were the rule otherwise, any litigant could create injury in fact by bringing a case, and Article III would present no real limitation.”