Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Borum v. United States
Borum v. United States, 284 U.S. 596 (1932)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1932-01-25
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- upholding the murder conviction of three codefendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing
- upholding the murder conviction of three co-defendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Borum v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 39 opinions
76 L.Ed. 513
BORUM et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 550.
Decided Jan. 25, 1932.
Mr. James A. O'Shea, of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. John H. Burnett, Alfred Goldstine, and Bertrand Emerson, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Borum and others.
The Attorney General, Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., and Erwin N. Griswold, both of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and William H. Collins, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the United States.
PER CURIAM.
Question answered 'Yes.' Dunn v. United States (No. 393) 284 U. S. 390, 52 S. Ct. 189, 76 L. Ed. 356, October term, 1931, decided January 11, 1932. Mandate to issue forthwith.