Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Borum v. United States

Borum v. United States, 52 S. Ct. 205 (1932)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1932-01-25
Topic
general

upholding the murder conviction of three codefendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three codefendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three co-defendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three co-defendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three co-defendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three codefendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three co-defendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three co-defendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing | upholding the murder conviction of three codefendants under a count that failed to specify which of the three did the actual killing

Citator

Cited by
27 opinions

284 U.S. 596

52 S.Ct. 205

76 L.Ed. 513

BORUM et al.
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 550.

Decided Jan. 25, 1932.

Mr. James A. O'Shea, of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. John H. Burnett, Alfred Goldstine, and Bertrand Emerson, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Borum and others.

The Attorney General, Messrs. Thomas D. Thacher, Sol. Gen., and Erwin N. Griswold, both of Washington, D. C. (Messrs. Leo A. Rover, U. S. Atty., and William H. Collins, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

1

Question answered 'Yes.' Dunn v. United States (No. 393) 284 U. S. 390, 52 S. Ct. 189, 76 L. Ed. 356, October term, 1931, decided January 11, 1932. Mandate to issue forthwith.