Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Borough of East Conemaugh v. Eastern Telecom Corp.

107 L. Ed. 2d 24

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-10-02
Topic
general

relatedness of acts established by “proof of their temporal proximity, or common goals, or similarity of methods, or repetitions” | "[I]f the racketeering acts were performed at the behest of an organized crime group, that fact would tend to belie any notion that the racketeering acts were sporadic or isolated." | "Frequent players in the bankruptcy arena ... are aware that deadlines are important and should not be heard to complain of unfairness except under the most egregious circumstances." | "Frequent players in the bankruptcy arena ... are aware that deadlines are important and should not be heard to complain of unfairness except under the most egregious circumstances.” | “[I]f the racketeering acts were performed at the behest of an organized crime group, that fact would tend to belie any notion that the racketeering acts were sporadic or isolated.” | creditor who is aware bankruptcy has been filed is not necessarily put on inquiry notice about every matter brought before court | traces the meandering and ever-changing state of the law with respect to what constitutes a “pattern” of racketeering under the RICO statute

Citator

Cited by
68 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.