Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bormann v. AT&T Communications, Inc.

Bormann v. AT&T Commc’ns, Inc., 107 L. Ed. 2d 272 (1989)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-10-16
Topic
general

holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, "counsel's failure to call witnesses is of no moment" | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding unsupervised release of ADEA rights permissible if knowing and voluntary | holding unsupervised release of ADEA rights permissible if knowing and voluntary | applying Title VII law to ADEA action | applying the Age Discrimination in Employment Act

Citator

Cited by
41 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.