Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bormann v. AT&T Communications, Inc.
Bormann v. AT&T Commc’ns, Inc., 107 L. Ed. 2d 272 (1989)
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1989-10-16
- Topic
- general
holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, "counsel's failure to call witnesses is of no moment" | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding that absent a showing that potential defense witnesses were available and that their testimony would benefit the defense, “counsel’s failure to call witnesses is of no moment” | holding unsupervised release of ADEA rights permissible if knowing and voluntary | holding unsupervised release of ADEA rights permissible if knowing and voluntary | applying Title VII law to ADEA action | applying the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
Citator
- Cited by
- 41 opinions
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.