Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bodimetric Health Services, Inc. v. Aetna Life & Casualty

111 S. Ct. 579

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1990-12-10
Topic
general

“[w]hile our holding will leave [plaintiff] without a remedy, the availability of a federal remedy is not a prerequisite for federal preemption” | "[w]hile our holding will leave [plaintiff] without a remedy, the availability of a federal remedy is not a prerequisite for federal preemption" | “[wjhile our holding will leave [plaintiff] without a remedy, the availability of a federal remedy is not a prerequisite for federal pre emption” | suit challenged 1985 Part B claim review procedure and resulting denial of Medicare claims for services provided in that year | ERISA pre-empted claim even though plaintiff lacked standing to sue under the Act | ERISA does not recognize the validity of an oral modification of a pension plan | discussing jurisdiction sufficient to make removal proper | discussing jurisdiction sufficient to make removal proper | Seventh Circuit declines to follow Green-blatt

Citator

Cited by
38 opinions

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.