Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Bevins v. Iowa
282 U.S. 815
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1931-02-02
- Topic
- general
Per Curiam: The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bevins v. Iowa. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 2 opinions
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373; Omaechevarria v. Idaho, 246 U. S. 343; Hygrade Provision Co. v. Sherman, 266 U. S. 497, 501. (2) Huntington v. Worthen; Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. v. Worthen, 120 U. S. 97, 102.