Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bernstein v. Real Estate Commission

363 U.S. 419

Type: Opinion
Court: Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction: Federal
Date: 1960-06-13
Topic: real-estate

Per Curiam. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bernstein v. Real Estate Commission. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Authority status: pending
Cited by: 1 opinion

BERNSTEINv. REAL ESTATE COMM'N,363 U.S. 419(1960)

BERNSTEIN ET AL.v. REAL ESTATE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND ET AL.

APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.

No. 852.

Decided June 13, 1960.

Appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Reported below:221 Md. 221,156 A.2d 657.

J. Calvin CarneyandWilliam H. Murphyfor appellants.C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, andJoseph S. Kaufman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Commission.Melvin J. Sykesfor appellees Allendale-Lyndhurst Improvement Assn., Inc., Allen Kleiman et ux. and Bernard Cherry et ux.; andDavid Kimmelmanof counsel for appellees Kleiman and Cherry.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.Page 420