Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bergdoll v. Harrigan

238 U.S. 609

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1915-04-26
Topic
general

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed with costs, upon the authority of rule 6, clause 5; Micas v. Williams, 104 U. S. 556; The Alaska, 130 U. S. 201; Chanute City v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Bergdoll v. Harrigan. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion
Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs, upon the authority of rule 6, clause 5; Micas v. Williams, 104 U. S. 556; The Alaska, 130 U. S. 201; Chanute City v. Trader, 132 U. S. 210, 214; Northern *610 Pacific Railroad v. Amato, 144 U. S. 465, 473, and cause remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Mr. Joseph Gilfillan and Mr. George S. Graham for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Joseph W. Catharine for the defendant in error.