Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Bassett Furniture Industries, Inc. v. Bravman

54 L. Ed. 2d 80

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1977-10-03
Topic
general

reversing the district court’s granting of summary judgment which held that restrictions imposed on an agent cannot violate the antitrust laws | “Suspicion, conjecture and speculation are not enough.... The purported fact issue must be actual rather than theoretical, real rather than imaginary.” | a challenge to a district court order dismissing a claim against a corporation for the actions of its employees is moot after a verdict is delivered in favor of the employees | a challenge to a district court order dismissing a claim against a corporation for the actions of its employees is moot after a verdict is delivered in favor of the employees | agency not required to initiate rulemaking when resulting rules merely describe controlling provisions | exclusive dealing requirement to be examined under rule of reason | specific intent to monopolize must relate to a specific market | design of streets and control of traffic flow | standing determined by "factual matrix" | standing determined by “factual matrix”

Citator

Cited by
54 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 552 F. 2d 90.