Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.
314 U.S. 94
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1941-11-10
- Topic
- general
Me. Justice Douglas delivered the opinion of the Court. This is a companion case to Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., ante, p. 84. The court below held that claims 2, 3, and 11 of the Mead patent (No. 1,736,544) were invalid and not infringed. 112 F. 2d 335.
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Automatic Devices Corp. v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co.. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 12 opinions
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This is a companion case to Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., ante, p. 84. The court below held that claims 2, 3, and 11 of the Mead patent (No. 1,736,544) were invalid and not infringed. 112 F. 2d 335. We granted the petition for certiorari limited to the question of validity of those claims. For the reasons stated in Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp., supra, the judgment is
Affirmed.