Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States
Audinot v. United States
498 U.S. 866
- Type
- Opinion
- Court
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Jurisdiction
- Federal
- Date
- 1990-10-01
- Topic
- general
How later courts describe this case
- holding that the Double Jeopardy Clause may be triggered when a “civil penalty ... rose to the level of criminal punishment because of the lack of rational relation to the Government’s loss”
- assessment of $1,791,100 in civil penalties based upon same conduct as criminal proceedings in civil action for filing false medicare claims remanded to the district court for a Halper analysis
- order of proceedings, civil and criminal, does not effect double jeopardy application
- the Halper principle applies whether civil penalty or criminal punishment comes first
Citator
UpLaw has not yet analyzed Audinot v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.
- Cited by
- 21 opinions
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.