Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Atlantic City Elec. Co. v. United States

400 U.S. 73

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1970-12-08
Topic
general

400 U.S. 73 (1970) ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. No. 78. Supreme Court of United States.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Atlantic City Elec. Co. v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
23 opinions
400 U.S. 73 (1970)

ATLANTIC CITY ELECTRIC CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

No. 78.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 12, 1970 Decided December 8, 1970[*] APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

James O'Malley, Jr., argued the cause for appellants in No. 78. With him on the briefs were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Walter J. Myskowski, Sheila H. Marshall, and Alfred E. Froh. Charles J. McCarthy argued the cause for appellants in No. 106. With him on the briefs were Arthur L. Winn, Jr., J. Raymond Clark, and Richard J. Hardy.

Deputy Solicitor General Springer argued the cause for the United States et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General McLaren, Howard E. Shapiro, Edward M. Shulman, William A. Imhof, Robert W. Ginnane, and Arthur J. Cerra. Hugh B. Cox argued the cause for appellees Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al. in both cases. With him on the brief were William H. Allen and Michael Boudin.

John F. Donelan and John M. Cleary filed a brief in No. 106 for the National Industrial Traffic League as amicus curiae urging reversal.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

NOTES

[*] Together with No. 106, Alabama Power Co. et al. v. United States et al., on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.