Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Arteaga v. California

522 U.S. 804

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1997-10-06
Topic
general

C. A. 9th Cir.; and Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until October 27, 1997, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Arteaga v. California. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
1 opinion

C. A. 9th Cir.; and

Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. Petitioners are allowed until October 27, 1997, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.