Anderson v. United States

holding that variance in model number of go-cart alleged in indictment and model number actually proved was not material in theft prosecution | holding that variance in model number of go-cart alleged in indictment and model number actually proved was not material in theft prosecution | structure proved by evidence "viewed in complete isolation from the group's pattern of racketeering activity." | structure proved by evidence "viewed in complete isolation from the group's pattern of racketeering activity." | "[I]t is only necessary for a defendant to have believed that a witness might give information to federal officials, and to have prevented this communication, to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1510." | “[I]t is only necessary for a defendant to have believed that a witness might give information to federal officials, and to have prevented this communication, to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1510.” | “[I]t is only necessary for a defendant to have believed that a witness might give information to federal officials, and to have prevented this communication, to violate 18 U.S.C. § 1510.”