Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut

Am. Elec. Power Co. v. Conn., 564 U.S. 410 (2011)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
2011-06-20
Topic
general

Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment. I concur in the judgment, and I agree with the Court’s displacement analysis on the assumption (which I make for the sake of argument because no party contends otherwise) that the interpretation of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., adopted by the majority in Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 127 S. Ct. 1438, 167 L. Ed. 2d 248 (2007), is correct.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Justice Alito,

with whom Justice Thomas joins, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

I concur in the judgment, and I agree with the Court’s displacement analysis on the assumption (which I make for the sake of argument because no party contends otherwise) that the interpretation of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq., adopted by the majority in Massachusetts v. EPA, 549 U.S. 497, 127 S. Ct. 1438, 167 L. Ed. 2d 248 (2007), is correct.