Alpha Wire Corp. v. Siegel

stating that the majority of courts construe the term “suit” to include any attempt to gain an end by a legal process | proceeding before industry board of contract appeal held to be a “suit” within the policy language | refitting of city's buildings contaminated by asbestos, to make them safe, was measure of plaintiffs' property damage | refitting of city’s buildings contaminated by asbestos, to make them safe, was measure of plaintiffs’ property damage | Interpreting New York contract law, the Court concluded that a letter from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality constituted a suit, as it was a formal demand for immediate action to clean up a hazardous waste site. | affirming dismissal of a takings claim on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, but noting "[i]t is significant that there are no allegations that all Moore's property was taken, or that he was denied all or substantially all of [the property's] economically viable use" | affirming dismissal of a takings claim on a Rule 12(b)(6) motion, but noting "[i]t is significant that there are no allegations that all Moore’s property was taken, or that he was denied all or substantially all of [the property’s] economically viable use" | a state environmental proceeding was “sufficiently adversarial to constitute a suit under New York law and within the meaning of the policy” | the general rule adopted by “the overwhelming majority of courts” holds that violation of the professional conduct rules “does not give rise to a civil cause of action.” | “a panel of this court may not overrule a decision of another panel.” | aff’g 643 F.Supp. 430, 431 (D.Md.1986)