Allen v. United States

where I discussed the distinction between res judicata and collateral estoppel and the requirements for collateral estoppel | quoted in 18 Charles A. Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 4417 (1981) | “In nearly all cases in which a combination or conspiracy is established through circumstantial evidence, the alleged conspirators have engaged in conduct which is in some sense congruent, compatible, or harmonious.” | “The antitrust laws are simply not a high-powered version of the laws relating to breach of contract, to be used whenever one is possessed of a particularly passionate grievance growing out of a business relationship”