Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Alexandrapolous v. United States

107 L. Ed. 2d 72

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1989-10-02
Topic
general

observing that admissions against penal interest have been held sufficient to establish probable cause for search warrant | finding admissible a letter from Honduran Navy attached to certification from United States Embassy in Honduras | requiring, however, that there be other indicia of reliability surrounding the statement to make it relevant to rebut the charges of fabrication | considering the defendant charged “with aiding and abetting [another] in knowingly receiving and possessing illegal machine guns in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 26 U.S.C. § 5861(c)” | noting courts’ refusals “to treat a bill of par ticulars as a general investigative tool for the defense, or as a device to compel disclosure of the government’s evidence or its legal theory prior to trial” | Court dismisses facial challenge to 46 U.S.C.App. § 1901 et seq. and refers to history of judicial acceptance of 21 U.S.C. § 955a(a) | “[T]elephone records are clearly included under this rule as discoverable objects to which defendants are entitled.” | defendant provided with discovery of affidavits submitted in support of wiretap application to permit him to challenge validity of wiretap order

Citator

Cited by
39 opinions

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.