Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Alaska v. United States

Alaska v. United States, 512 U.S. 1219 (1994)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1994-06-20
Topic
general

How later courts describe this case

  • holding that possible procedural lapses in collection process will not render disclosures necessary to collection wrongful
  • “Here one factor predominates to make clear that the district court acted with its discretion [in approving the settlement]. That factor is [defendant’s] financial condition.”
  • “aggregate amount of the proposed settlement and the formula for computing recoveries was all that was required”
  • “Here one factor predominates to make clear that the district court acted within its discretion [in approving the settlement]. That factor is [defendant’s] financial condition.”
  • plaintiffs established injury in fact when they alleged they were not “able to freely use the public areas” due to the presence of a cross on public land
  • APA does not waive sovereign immunity for contract claims seeking equitable relief

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Alaska v. United States. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Cited by
82 opinions

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.