Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. v. Sarasota-Manatee Airport Authority

holding that appealability relates to an order's enforceability, not its adherence to Rule 65(d) | providing a detailed discussion of the differing ripeness analyses depending on the constitutional theories involved and the remedies that a plaintiff is seeking | deeming a broad construction of the term “use” as appropriate where the benefit derived by the user depended on the existence of the entire airport facility | deeming a broad construction of the term "use" as appropriate where the benefit derived by the user depended on the existence of the entire airport facility | dividing theories into three: just compensation, due process takings and arbitrary and capricious due process | providing a detailed discussion of the differing ripeness analyses depending on the constitutional theories involved and the remedies that a plaintiff is seeking | “[I]f there is no dispute over the meaning of a contract, there is nothing for [the arbitrators] to do” | "there is a considerable question, though again one not necessary to decide, concerning the district court’s power to order arbitration.” | what the railroad is allowed to do is the status quo even if the railroad has not been doing it