Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Akzo N. V. v. United States International Trade Commission

96 L. Ed. 2d 382

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1987-06-01
Topic
general

relying on South to reject the claim that the trial court erred in refusing to allow the defendant to use hypothetical question on voire dire in an attempt to discover hidden biases or prejudices concerning the death penalty | “Obviously, where confidential material is disclosed to an employee of a competitor, the risk of the competitor’s obtaining an unfair business advantage may be substantially increased.” | “Disclosure of sensitive materials to a [business] adversary would undoubtedly have a chilling effect on the parties’ willingness to provide the confidential information essential to the [agency’s] fact-finding processes.” | "Disclosure of sensitive materials to a [business] adversary would undoubtedly have a chilling effect on the parties' willingness to provide the confidential information essential to the [agency's] fact-finding processes." | “Obviously, where confidential material is disclosed to an employee of a competitor, the risk of the competitor’s obtaining an unfair business advantage may be substantially increased.” | adopting the PTO’s standard of materiality as the “major standard”

Citator

Cited by
29 opinions

C. A. Fed. Cir. Motion of Kingdom of the Netherlands for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari denied.