Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Adler v. Cincinnati

Adler v. Cincinnati, 303 U.S. 622 (1938)

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1938-03-07
Topic
general

Per Curiam: The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Bellingham Bay & B. C. R. Co. v.

Citator

UpLaw has not yet analyzed Adler v. Cincinnati. The absence of a flag is not a finding that it is good law.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Bellingham Bay & B. C. R. Co. v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 320; Ballard v. Hunter, 204 U. S. 241, 262; North Laramie Land Co. v. Hoffman, 268 U. S. 276, 283; Witzelberg v. Cincinnati, 302 U. S. 635.