Adams v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California

trial court's decision will be sustained if correct on any theory of "law applicable to the case", especially with regard to admission of evidence | trial court’s decision will be sustained if correct on any theory of “law applicable to the case”, especially with regard to admission of evidence | accomplice testimony need not be corroborated to be legally sufficient to show corpus delicti | accom-plice testimony need not be corroborated to be legally sufficient to show corpus de-licti | failure to object to proffered character testimony forfeits appellate claim that it should not have been admitted | "the denial of a motion in limine is not sufficient to preserve error” | accomplice testimony need not be corroborated to be legally sufficient to show corpus delicti