Opinion · Supreme Court of the United States

Adams v. United States

474 U.S. 971

Type
Opinion
Court
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdiction
Federal
Date
1985-11-04
Topic
general

White, J., joined by Burger, C.J., dissenting from a denial of certiorari in a recent RICO conspiracy case | a Sec. 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts | White, J., joined by Burger, C.J., dissenting from a denial of certiorari in a recent RICO conspiracy case | a § 1962(d) violation need not arise from an agreement that the defendant himself commit the predicate acts | "the decision to grant immunity is reserved to the discretion of the executive branch." | count of indictment sufficient although it did not identify specific drug | count of indictment sufficient although it did not identify specific drug | “Even if [allegedly newly discovered] evidence could convince the jury to disregard ... [the] testimony [of a particular prosecution witness] ..., the other evidence in the case was more than sufficient to sustain a finding of guilt.” | court limited cross-examination of witness in the Witness Protection Program | court limited cross-examination of witness in the Witness Protection Program | examining the "context of the entire trial" | examining the “context of the entire trial”

Citator

Cited by
44 opinions

C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.