Ouzts v. Maryland National Insurance

holding that the bondsman who performed a citizen’s arrest was not a state actor-since he did not act pursuant to state law | requiring defendant “to show specifically the reasons why such services are necessary” and “to state what he expected specifically to find” through the use of such services | Nevada bondsmen acted in their own financial interest and did not act under California law when they forcibly captured individuals in California | if authenticity or the relevancy of the items depicted in the photographs is not at issue, admission into evidence of the photographs thereof is'at the court’s discretion